<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maersk Air - Charter Airline &#187; airport security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maersk-air.com/tag/airport-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maersk-air.com</link>
	<description>Providing Non Stop Jet Charter Services in Europe, Asia, Middle East &#38; Africa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:17:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Rules for Private Planes are a No Go</title>
		<link>http://www.maersk-air.com/private-charter/new-rules-for-private-planes-are-a-no-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.maersk-air.com/private-charter/new-rules-for-private-planes-are-a-no-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Private Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airline safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation security administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maersk-air.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The plan called for every general aviation flight--personal plane used for business or pleasure--to be checked against all terrorist watch lists. Expensive new security programs would be required for at least 300 small airports across the nation. <a href="http://www.maersk-air.com/private-charter/new-rules-for-private-planes-are-a-no-go/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 2008, the Transportation Security Administration has been pushing for stronger security requirements on small airports and <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123390163" target="_blank">private planes</a>.  The reasoning behind these regulations was said to be wrapped up in terrorist concerns (naturally).</p>
<p>The TSA claimed that since security measures were getting so stellar in the commercial sector (yes, they actually stated this as a fact), they made private planes and smaller airports more vulnerable to an attack. <span id="more-120"></span>Terrorists would, apparently, be so terrified of hijacking a commercial plane that they would have no choice but to commandeer a personal plane instead.</p>
<p>As usual, a very logical point from the TSA.</p>
<p>The plan called for every general aviation flight&#8211;personal plane used for business or pleasure&#8211;to be checked against all terrorist watch lists. Expensive new security programs would be required for at least 300 small airports across the nation.</p>
<p>It turns out that the Administration quickly realized the redundancy of their plan, and the idea for the new increased security measures&#8211;a costly and controversial mandate&#8211;has now been scrapped.</p>
<p>The decision has been attributed to a strong outcry from the general aviation industry as a whole. Pilots complained that the measures were unnecessary given the small risk of a terrorist attack, as well as the lack of trust in their decisions to carry safe people on their planes.</p>
<p>Of course, the TSA still maintains that a risk is very real and dangerous, and general aviation manager Brian Delauter says that a collaboration between the industry and the TSA in negotiating new measures will be necessary.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1.25em;margin-left: 0px;line-height: 1.45em;font-size: 0.85em;padding: 0px">
<p style="margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 1.25em;margin-left: 0px;line-height: 1.45em;font-size: 0.85em;padding: 0px">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maersk-air.com/private-charter/new-rules-for-private-planes-are-a-no-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

